Home / Compare / MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), GLM 5.3 costs 6.1× as much as MiMo-V2.6-Flash: $2.41 against $0.392 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3
Input, per 1M tokens$0.14$0.325
Output, per 1M tokens$0.28$4.40
Context window1.05M1.31M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.0868$0.239
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.392$2.41
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$1.26$4.80
Confidence signalnoyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400326not measured

Which one should carry your traffic?

If MiMo-V2.6-Flash answers your requests as well as GLM 5.3, moving that traffic saves 84% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. MiMo-V2.6-Flash does not expose a confidence signal through OpenRouter, so Gimbix would test it as a full replacement rather than a first answer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash profile · GLM 5.3 profile · Measure it on your traffic