Home / Compare / MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), GLM 5.3 Flash costs 1.3× as much as MiMo-V2.6-Flash: $0.50 against $0.392 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 Flash
Input, per 1M tokens$0.14$0.15
Output, per 1M tokens$0.28$0.50
Context window1.05M1.31M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.0868$0.095
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.392$0.50
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$1.26$1.45
Confidence signalnoyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400326320

Which one should carry your traffic?

If MiMo-V2.6-Flash answers your requests as well as GLM 5.3 Flash, moving that traffic saves 22% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. MiMo-V2.6-Flash does not expose a confidence signal through OpenRouter, so Gimbix would test it as a full replacement rather than a first answer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash profile · GLM 5.3 Flash profile · Measure it on your traffic