Home / Compare / GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.7 Flash

GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.7 Flash

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), GPT-6 Astra costs 357× as much as Qwen3.7 Flash: $40.00 against $0.112 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

GPT-6 AstraQwen3.7 Flash
Input, per 1M tokens$10.00$0.03
Output, per 1M tokens$50.00$0.13
Context window1.05M1M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$6.50$0.0193
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$40.00$0.112
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$105$0.305
Confidence signalnoyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400not measured286

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Qwen3.7 Flash answers your requests as well as GPT-6 Astra, moving that traffic saves 100% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Qwen3.7 Flash exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to GPT-6 Astra.

GPT-6 Astra profile · Qwen3.7 Flash profile · Measure it on your traffic