Home / Compare / Mistral Large 3 2512 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Mistral Large 3 2512 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Mistral Large 3 2512 costs 14× as much as Qwen3.7 Flash: $1.60 against $0.112 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Mistral Large 3 2512Qwen3.7 Flash
Input, per 1M tokens$0.50$0.03
Output, per 1M tokens$1.50$0.13
Context window262K1M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.315$0.0193
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$1.60$0.112
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$4.75$0.305
Confidence signalnoyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400not measured286

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Qwen3.7 Flash answers your requests as well as Mistral Large 3 2512, moving that traffic saves 93% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Qwen3.7 Flash exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Mistral Large 3 2512.

Mistral Large 3 2512 profile · Qwen3.7 Flash profile · Measure it on your traffic