Home / Compare / Ministral 3 8B 2512 vs GPT-5.4 Nano

Ministral 3 8B 2512 vs GPT-5.4 Nano

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), GPT-5.4 Nano costs 2.5× as much as Ministral 3 8B 2512: $0.90 against $0.36 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Ministral 3 8B 2512GPT-5.4 Nano
Input, per 1M tokens$0.15$0.20
Output, per 1M tokens$0.15$1.25
Context window262K400K
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.0915$0.133
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.36$0.90
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$1.27$2.23
Confidence signalnono
Tool callingyesyes

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Ministral 3 8B 2512 answers your requests as well as GPT-5.4 Nano, moving that traffic saves 60% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Ministral 3 8B 2512 does not expose a confidence signal through OpenRouter, so Gimbix would test it as a full replacement rather than a first answer.

Ministral 3 8B 2512 profile · GPT-5.4 Nano profile · Measure it on your traffic