Home / Compare / Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 1.2× as much as Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: $0.392 against $0.328 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Llama 3.3 70B InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input, per 1M tokens$0.10$0.14
Output, per 1M tokens$0.32$0.28
Context window131K1.05M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.0632$0.0868
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.328$0.392
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$0.96$1.26
Confidence signalyesno
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400305326

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Llama 3.3 70B Instruct answers your requests as well as MiMo-V2.6-Flash, moving that traffic saves 16% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct profile · MiMo-V2.6-Flash profile · Measure it on your traffic