Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 4.9× as much as Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: $1.60 against $0.328 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.10 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $2.50 | $0.32 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000 | $0.205 | $0.0632 |
| Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000 | $1.60 | $0.328 |
| Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000 | $3.65 | $0.96 |
| Confidence signal | no | yes |
| Tool calling | yes | yes |
| BANKING77, correct of 400 | 305 | 305 |
Which one should carry your traffic?
If Llama 3.3 70B Instruct answers your requests as well as Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, moving that traffic saves 80% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite profile · Llama 3.3 70B Instruct profile · Measure it on your traffic