Home / Compare / DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Ministral 3 8B 2512

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Ministral 3 8B 2512

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs 7.4× as much as Ministral 3 8B 2512: $2.67 against $0.36 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Ministral 3 8B 2512
Input, per 1M tokens$0.955$0.15
Output, per 1M tokens$1.91$0.15
Context window1.05M262K
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.592$0.0915
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$2.67$0.36
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$8.60$1.27
Confidence signalyesno
Tool callingyesyes

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Ministral 3 8B 2512 answers your requests as well as DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, moving that traffic saves 87% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Ministral 3 8B 2512 does not expose a confidence signal through OpenRouter, so Gimbix would test it as a full replacement rather than a first answer.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 profile · Ministral 3 8B 2512 profile · Measure it on your traffic