Home / Compare / DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Ministral 3 8B 2512

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Ministral 3 8B 2512

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Ministral 3 8B 2512 costs 2.1× as much as DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: $0.36 against $0.17 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Ministral 3 8B 2512
Input, per 1M tokens$0.021$0.15
Output, per 1M tokens$0.32$0.15
Context window1.31M262K
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.0158$0.0915
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.17$0.36
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$0.328$1.27
Confidence signalyesno
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400298not measured

Which one should carry your traffic?

If DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 answers your requests as well as Ministral 3 8B 2512, moving that traffic saves 53% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Ministral 3 8B 2512.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 profile · Ministral 3 8B 2512 profile · Measure it on your traffic