Home / Compare / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs 1.1× as much as DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: $0.328 against $0.299 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input, per 1M tokens$0.0295$0.10
Output, per 1M tokens$0.60$0.32
Context window1.05M131K
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.0237$0.0632
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.299$0.328
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$0.536$0.96
Confidence signalyesyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400316305

Which one should carry your traffic?

If DeepSeek V4.1 Flash answers your requests as well as Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, moving that traffic saves 9% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash profile · Llama 3.3 70B Instruct profile · Measure it on your traffic