Home / Compare / Command R7B (12-2024) vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Command R7B (12-2024) vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Nemotron 3 Ultra costs 16× as much as Command R7B (12-2024): $2.16 against $0.135 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Command R7B (12-2024)Nemotron 3 Ultra
Input, per 1M tokens$0.0375$0.60
Output, per 1M tokens$0.15$2.40
Context window128K262K
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.024$0.384
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.135$2.16
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$0.375$6.00
Confidence signalnono
Tool callingnoyes

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Command R7B (12-2024) answers your requests as well as Nemotron 3 Ultra, moving that traffic saves 94% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Command R7B (12-2024) does not expose a confidence signal through OpenRouter, so Gimbix would test it as a full replacement rather than a first answer.

Command R7B (12-2024) profile · Nemotron 3 Ultra profile · Measure it on your traffic