Home / Compare / Command R7B (12-2024) vs Mistral Large 3 2512

Command R7B (12-2024) vs Mistral Large 3 2512

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Mistral Large 3 2512 costs 12× as much as Command R7B (12-2024): $1.60 against $0.135 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Command R7B (12-2024)Mistral Large 3 2512
Input, per 1M tokens$0.0375$0.50
Output, per 1M tokens$0.15$1.50
Context window128K262K
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.024$0.315
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.135$1.60
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$0.375$4.75
Confidence signalnono
Tool callingnoyes

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Command R7B (12-2024) answers your requests as well as Mistral Large 3 2512, moving that traffic saves 92% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Command R7B (12-2024) does not expose a confidence signal through OpenRouter, so Gimbix would test it as a full replacement rather than a first answer.

Command R7B (12-2024) profile · Mistral Large 3 2512 profile · Measure it on your traffic