Home / Compare / Command A vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Command A vs GLM 5.3 Flash

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Command A costs 18× as much as GLM 5.3 Flash: $9.00 against $0.50 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Command AGLM 5.3 Flash
Input, per 1M tokens$2.50$0.15
Output, per 1M tokens$10.00$0.50
Context window256K1.31M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$1.60$0.095
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$9.00$0.50
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$25.00$1.45
Confidence signalnoyes
Tool callingnoyes
BANKING77, correct of 400not measured320

Which one should carry your traffic?

If GLM 5.3 Flash answers your requests as well as Command A, moving that traffic saves 94% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. GLM 5.3 Flash exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Command A.

Command A profile · GLM 5.3 Flash profile · Measure it on your traffic