Home / Compare / Command A vs Kimi K3

Command A vs Kimi K3

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Kimi K3 costs 1.3× as much as Command A: $12.00 against $9.00 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Command AKimi K3
Input, per 1M tokens$2.50$3.00
Output, per 1M tokens$10.00$15.00
Context window256K1.05M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$1.60$1.95
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$9.00$12.00
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$25.00$31.50
Confidence signalnoyes
Tool callingnoyes

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Command A answers your requests as well as Kimi K3, moving that traffic saves 25% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Command A does not expose a confidence signal through OpenRouter, so Gimbix would test it as a full replacement rather than a first answer.

Command A profile · Kimi K3 profile · Measure it on your traffic