Home / Compare / Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Claude Opus 5 costs 3.1× as much as Qwen3.8 Max (0902): $20.00 against $6.40 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Claude Opus 5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input, per 1M tokens$5.00$2.00
Output, per 1M tokens$25.00$6.00
Context window1M1M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$3.25$1.26
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$20.00$6.40
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$52.50$19.00
Confidence signalnoyes
Tool callingyesyes

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Qwen3.8 Max (0902) answers your requests as well as Claude Opus 5, moving that traffic saves 68% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Claude Opus 5.

Claude Opus 5 profile · Qwen3.8 Max (0902) profile · Measure it on your traffic