Home / Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Claude Fable 5.1 costs 6.3× as much as Qwen3.8 Max (0902): $40.00 against $6.40 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Claude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input, per 1M tokens$10.00$2.00
Output, per 1M tokens$50.00$6.00
Context window1M1M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$6.50$1.26
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$40.00$6.40
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$105$19.00
Confidence signalnoyes
Tool callingyesyes

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Qwen3.8 Max (0902) answers your requests as well as Claude Fable 5.1, moving that traffic saves 84% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Claude Fable 5.1.

Claude Fable 5.1 profile · Qwen3.8 Max (0902) profile · Measure it on your traffic