Home / Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Claude Fable 5.1 costs 235× as much as DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: $40.00 against $0.17 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Claude Fable 5.1DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input, per 1M tokens$10.00$0.021
Output, per 1M tokens$50.00$0.32
Context window1M1.31M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$6.50$0.0158
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$40.00$0.17
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$105$0.328
Confidence signalnoyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400not measured298

Which one should carry your traffic?

If DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 answers your requests as well as Claude Fable 5.1, moving that traffic saves 100% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Claude Fable 5.1.

Claude Fable 5.1 profile · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 profile · Measure it on your traffic